Virtology GlobalAn initiative of Instituto Virtudes · Brazil
Harsh self-criticism is pride turned inward: the same ruler pride uses, now measuring you against an ideal all day long. That is why pushing yourself harder rarely makes you better.
English edition of Isabella Becker’s Portuguese essay, adapted for international readers. The article presents Virtology’s interpretation; its specific theoretical mechanisms should be distinguished from independently established clinical findings.
Harsh self-criticism is pride turned inward. In Eduardo Casarotto’s Virtology, the inner critic is a lack of humility applied to yourself: the same ruler pride uses, now measuring you against an ideal, all day long. It is not the pride that displays itself to others. It is the pride that turns against the person who carries it.
This article is about that pride turned inward. It begins with a case of my own, because I have this critic too, and it is a loud one.
I needed to cancel an order of contact lenses. An email told me they were ready and about to be shipped, and I had forgotten to cancel them. The solution was to call the optician. In German.
My first reaction was immediate: I will ask my husband to call. I speak German, but on the phone, without seeing the other person, and nervous, my tongue freezes. That day I decided to do it differently. I thought: I am going to practice my Humility. I am going to call, explain my problem and cancel the order.
I called with a short written script in my hand. I got everything wrong. The man on the line understood, explained what I needed to do, I thanked him and hung up. Problem solved.
Then it started. Idiot. See? Ridiculous. What must he have thought of you? Instead of leaving the call with the feeling that I had managed it, I left punishing myself. What should have been a small victory became one more piece of evidence against me.
For a long time I would have called this having standards. Wanting to do things well. Today I read that moment differently, and that reading is what I want to share here.
In Virtology, pride is not an isolated character flaw. It is a brain system, the SNO, the Pride Neurofunctional System, and it keeps measuring one thing: how much am I worth according to the position I hold? For the oldest parts of the brain, mattering means being safe, and being left out of the group means danger. That is why pride is so fast and so strong. It was born to protect survival. I describe that system in more detail in Pride is not what you think.
Most of the time, that measurement compares you with someone else. In self-criticism, the comparison is with an ideal version of yourself. The one who should have spoken better. The one who should be further along by now. The one who would not get the verb wrong on the phone. The inner critic is that measurement running all day, measuring the distance between who you are and who you think you should be.
The inner critic never stops criticizing. It points out the mistake, demands, judges, compares. And the tool it uses is the same one used by the pride that shows off: the ruler of personal worth. The person who shows off uses the ruler to place themselves above others. The person who criticizes themselves nonstop uses the same ruler to measure everything they do against an ideal, and always finds they fell short. In both cases, worth is still being measured by position.
That is why criticizing yourself all the time is not Humility. It looks like high standards, it looks like responsibility, but it is pride measuring again. Humility does not change the score you give yourself. It takes the ruler out of your hand. The older article Why you’re so hard on yourself opened this idea briefly; here I want to follow the mechanism further.
The critic sounds like one voice, but it is often several speaking at once. Separating them helps you stop arguing with the wrong one.
“You should have done better.” This is the voice of the superego: rules that came from outside, from family, school, religion, and that are held in place by fear of punishment rather than by your own discernment. Virtology adds an important detail: what sustains every superego is pride, the fear of losing one’s place in the group. I explored this side of the critic in The inner voice that is never satisfied.
“What will they think of you?” This is something else. It is not a rule. It is an audience. It is the part of pride that simulates another person’s gaze and calculates how much you are worth to them. In my case, this was the loudest voice. I did not think “the right thing is to speak perfect German.” I thought “what must he have thought of me?”
“It has to be perfect.” This is armor. Perfectionism works as a shield: if I do it perfectly, nobody will find me ridiculous. I wrote about it in Perfectionism is fear dressed as excellence.
When these voices have been in charge for a long time, they stop sounding like voices. They start sounding like you. I have said it myself: “it is not the superego, it is my own voice.” The fact that it sounds like yours does not prove that it is you. It only proves it has been there long enough to blend in.
To understand why my small victory turned into punishment, I need a finding from outside Virtology, from the neuroscience of reward.
In the 1990s, the researcher Wolfram Schultz recorded dopamine neurons in monkeys that received a sip of juice after a light came on. What he found changed the idea that dopamine is the neurotransmitter of pleasure. Dopamine does not respond to the juice. It responds to the difference between what the monkey expected and what arrived.
The point that matters here is this: the brain does not measure the result. It measures the result against the expectation. The same event can become a reward or a punishment depending on what you expected from it.
Go back to the phone call. The goal was to cancel the lenses. I cancelled them. Measured against the goal, the result was better than I feared: I thought I would not manage, and I did. That should have registered as a good surprise.
But the expectation I took into the call was not “cancel the order.” It was “speak properly.” And that expectation was not set by the goal. It was set by the ruler. Measured against the ruler, the result was worse than expected. The brain kept the ruler, and what was a victory became a punishment.
Virtology adds a piece that reward neuroscience does not contain. In Eduardo Casarotto’s words:
The “error” here is the surprise, the difference between what was predicted and what happened. It is what teaches the brain to correct its prediction. When pride prevents that difference from being registered, the old belief stays standing, however clearly life has shown something else.
The best-known route is rationalization. Something goes well and the mind produces an explanation that takes the credit away: it was luck, the other person was in a good mood, anyone could have done it. The gain becomes chance, and nobody has to admit that the old reading was wrong.
Self-criticism is another route, and this is my own reading in the light of Virtology. Instead of turning the gain into chance, it turns the gain into failure. The person does not say “it was luck.” They say “it was ridiculous.” The effect is the same: the surprise never arrives. In my case, the old belief, “speaking German on the phone is humiliating, better ask someone else,” came out of the call intact. Perhaps even stronger.
This explains something that puzzles people who are hard on themselves. They practice, they expose themselves, they do the difficult thing, and they do not change. They did the part that training asks for. But they erased the result at the moment of recording it.
The most common defense of the inner critic is that it keeps you moving. Without it, you would relax, your results would suffer, you would settle. It sounds logical. It does not hold.
People who are hard on themselves seem to look at their mistakes all the time. But they look at a mistake as a verdict on their worth, not as information. That difference decides everything.
When a mistake is a verdict, energy goes into defending against it: shame, rumination, the scene replayed at night. Little is left for the useful question, which is what exactly went wrong and what to do differently. The mistake hurts a lot and teaches little. So it comes back, and when it comes back, the self-criticism grows.
When a mistake is information, it hurts less and teaches more. “I conjugated the verb wrongly” is data. You can study the conjugation. “I was ridiculous” is not data. There is nothing to study there. It is only a score about your position.
There is a simple test I use with myself and with the people I work with. When the critic speaks, ask: does this sentence give me anything to correct?
The sentences that give you something to correct are about behavior. The ones that do not are about being. The first kind you use. The second kind you recognize and do not obey. There is no need to argue with them or to prove them wrong. It is enough to recognize them: “the ruler again.”
Virtology draws a similar distinction about guilt. There is superego guilt, social, made of “what will people think” and “I should have.” That kind is removed. And there is guilt of the Self, a legitimate signal: here I hurt someone, here I betrayed what I believe. That kind is listened to. The inner critic almost always speaks with the first and presents itself as the second.
Now it is possible to see what really happened in my phone call.
Humility has two moments. The first comes before: exposing yourself without knowing how to do it well, accepting the risk of making a mistake in front of someone. The second comes after: not turning the result into a score about your worth.
In the first moment, I won. Pride said “do not expose yourself, ask someone else,” and I called. In the second moment, pride came back in full force. It lost the first round and won the second.
There is also a detail in the words I used. I said I would “control my pride.” Control is not the same as Humility. Control holds pride down by force, and control is itself one of the forms of pride. Humility is the measuring of position switching off. It is speaking German badly no longer saying anything about how much I am worth.
In Virtology, Humility is not thinking less of yourself. It is changing the axis. Worth no longer comes from position, whether in front of other people or in front of the ideal. And the sign that it is taking root has a marker that Casarotto describes precisely:
For someone who is hard on themselves, the pause sits between “I got the verb wrong” and “I am ridiculous.” A choice that did not exist before fits into that interval.
It would be simple to say “work on Humility” and stop here. But in Virtology no virtue works alone, and the order matters. Self-criticism belongs to a picture that Casarotto describes together with guilt, self-sabotage and shame, and it calls for a combination of virtues.
Humility opens the way. Without it, the others become performance. It is the first virtue at the base of the Pyramid of Virtues for a mechanical reason: pride closes the channel through which the brain learns from mistakes, and Humility is what reopens it.
Individuation is the one that addresses the audience. Its marker is exactly what a self-critical person lacks: the imaginary audience is no longer consulted. But it requires Humility first. Without Humility, Individuation turns into the opposite of what is sought: the person stops caring about the audience because they now feel above it. The same ruler again, now at the top end.
State of Certainty comes in because perfectionism is rooted in control. It is acting without a guarantee that things will turn out right. It also requires Humility and Acceptance first.
Responsibility belongs to this combination too, but only after Acceptance and Forgiveness. Asking for responsibility from someone who is still fighting their own mistake is handing one more whip to someone who already whips themselves.
Further on, beyond the base, come Gentleness, which is the tone in which you speak to yourself, and Good Humor, whose marker is speaking about your own difficulty lightly. “My phone German is a show of its own” is, quite literally, Good Humor practice. But these come later. The Pyramid has an order, and skipping steps produces virtue that is only acted.
The critic gains strength because it sets the expectation without you noticing. The practice is to take that job away from it.
A warning about step two. You will feel that measuring only by the goal is settling for too little. That feeling is the ruler trying to come back. Measuring by the goal does not stop you from improving the form. It only stops the form from being used against you.
The voice does not disappear. It is worth knowing this from the start, so that nobody concludes they have failed when it returns.
What changes is its function. Before, the voice commands: it speaks, you obey, and the rest of the day carries its taste. Later, the voice informs: it speaks, you recognize “there is the ruler,” and it no longer decides how you feel. Virtology describes this movement for every alarm in body and mind. The signal does not vanish. It stops commanding and starts informing.
And this does not happen with one phone call. One call does not inscribe a virtue. What inscribes it is repetition, in real situations, under pressure, many times. My call to the optician was one attempt. It was worth it for the part that worked, and also for the part that did not, because it showed me where pride comes in. Next time, I already know at which moment it will appear.
Perhaps that is the most concrete gain of seeing the critic as pride. As long as it looks like high standards, you respect it. When you see that it is the same ruler pride uses, only turned inward, you can stop obeying it.
If the inner voice has moved beyond self-criticism into something heavier, such as feeling worthless, hopelessness or thoughts of harming yourself, please do not carry it alone. Reach out to someone you trust or to a mental-health professional, and if you ever feel unsafe, contact a local crisis line or emergency services. This kind of suffering can be treated, and asking for help is not a failure.
Continue with Pride is not what you think, The inner voice that is never satisfied, or the 12-Step guided trail.
Looking for a certified Virtologist, information about the training, or a partnership outside Brazil? Write to the international director for your region.
Write to Isabella Becker · EMEA →Write to Ana Karolina Cejudo · Americas →Want the whole framework, for yourself or to help others as a professional? Start with the short course, or take the full training with Dr. Eduardo Casarotto.
The Institute’s Professional Formation with Dr. Eduardo Casarotto is the complete training: the entire framework, the clinical method and the certification to practice.
Explore the Professional Formation →Translated and edited from the Portuguese essay.